Income distribution and poverty reduction in Georgia
In a recent study, the German Economic Team analyses recent developments in income distribution and poverty reduction in Georgia between 2010 and 2018, looking at trends within Georgia and putting them in an international context. Due to limited data availability, this study does not relate to the most recent distributional policies of the government and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Income distribution and poverty reduction in Georgia – A comparative analysis
This paper analyses income distribution and poverty reduction in Georgia in the period 2010 to 2017/2018. As we have no data for 2019, our findings do not relate to the most recent distributional policies of the Georgian government. Our results suggest that while Georgia has substantially reduced poverty and income inequality, continuous monitoring of the situation would be helpful.
Georgia’s economic situation in light of COVID-19
Georgia will be severely hit by the COVID-19 pandemic. While economic fundamentals were good going prior to the crisis, forecasts now show a strong deterioration. Most visibly, real GDP growth is expected to change its sign, from a previous forecast of +4.3% to -4.0%.
Agro-exports to the EU: volumes, transport and logistics
Production volumes, as well as barriers in transport and logistics, play a key role in constraining agro-food exports from Georgia to the European Union. These challenges can be addressed by focusing on increasing exports through foreign direct investment and by accelerating exports of existing producers; by providing critical logistics infrastructure, including an airport cargo terminal in Kutaisi; by stimulating domestic demand for quality logistics; and by bundling interests and closing information gaps.
Strong economic growth despite Russian sanctions
In spite of the Russian sanctions, Georgia’s economic growth was high reaching 5.2% in 2019. The successful absorption of this external shock demonstrates the strong resilience of the Georgian economy, which will grow by more than 4% also in 2020.
Georgia’s financial system on a more stable footing
Over the past year excessively rapid growth of household lending has been successfully reined in, and aggressive lending practices of microfinance institutions have been banned. The high level of dollarisation and excessive debt of households remain vulnerabilities of the financial system and constrain monetary and exchange rate policy. The National Bank has made good progress in developing a regulatory framework for capital markets. The pensions fund became operational in 2019 and may support liquidity in local markets.
Startups in Tbilisi: what is needed to accelerate their development?
In recent years, Tbilisi has begun to develop a startup sector. There now are more than 100 small companies, working to develop scalable solutions for problems in Georgia and beyond. Many of these startups are supported by the government through a targeted programme. Several startups have international ambitions, and some founders have gone to highly regarded incubator programmes in Europe or the United States.
Georgia’s macroeconomic situation in light of Russian sanctions
On 21 June, Russia announced a ban of direct flights to/from Georgia. The ban will not only have a strong impact on the tourist industry, but will also affect the macroeconomic situation, given the importance of tourism for the Georgian economy.
The estimated impact of Russian sanctions on GDP amounts to 1 percentage point. As a result, we expect a slowdown in real GDP growth from 4.7% in 2018 to 3.6% in 2019. Expectedly, the Georgian Lari has come under pressure: since 21 June, the Lari depreciated by about 4.5% against the US dollar.
The effect of the DCFTA on Georgian exports to the EU
Georgia and the EU established a deep and comprehensive free trade area (DCFTA), which came into force in 2014. In a recent comparative study, which also includes Ukraine and Moldova, we look at the effect of the DCFTA on Georgian exports to the EU.
Between 2013 and 2018, exports to the EU – as defined in our study – increased by a rather moderate 9% in US dollar terms. However, in the same period prices for key Georgian export products declined heavily. In real terms, i.e. using constant prices of 2013, Georgian exports to the EU increased by 115%. Having said that, the EU was not able to increase its share as an export destination for Georgian products: the share remained flat at 16%. All in all, we conclude that the DCFTA had a positive, but moderate effect on Georgian exports to the EU.
Reduction of Georgia’s current account deficit: a new trend?
Traditionally, Georgia has a high current account deficit, which averaged 13% of GDP between 2007 and 2016. This has caused some concern, as it makes the country vulnerable to external shocks. However, in the last two years, Georgia’s current account deficit has been declining, standing at “only” 7.7% of GDP in 2018.
This positive development has come mostly on the back of an increase in exports of services, which is the result of a booming tourism sector. Moreover, remittances have been strong, reaching record Levels of about USD 1.6 bn in 2018.
Export potential of Georgian agro-food products in the EU market
With 29%, agro-food products make up for a significant share of Georgian exports. Despite having a free trade agreement with the EU, however, Georgian agro-food exports to the EU underperform. About 2/3 of all agro-food exports go to the CIS region. In terms of dynamics, exports to the CIS surged by 43% in 2018, whereas exports to the EU market only increased by 14%.
Slowdown of economic growth
The overall macroeconomic situation in Georgia re-mains stable. Economic growth amounted to 5.4% in the first half of 2018. However, a slowdown took place in the second half of the year, which will con-tinue in 2019. As a result, Georgia will grow at a moderate rate of 4.6% in 2019.
Turkish Lira depreciation: moderate effect on Georgia
From January to August 2018, the Turkish Lira depre-ciated by 42% against the Georgian Lari, raising con-cerns about the ability of the Georgian economy to withstand the pressure, given extensive economic links between the countries.
Economic relevance of crypto-mining in Georgia
Georgia is one of the leading producers (“miners”) of cryptocurrencies worldwide. Despite this fact, little is known about the relevance of crypto-mining for the Georgian economy. Official statistics fail to properly record the mining activity, which to a large extent takes place in free industrial zones.
Georgia in mid-2018: positive economic trend continues
In 2017, the Georgian economy developed well. By mid-2018 we observe a continuation of this trend. GDP increased by 5.0% in 2017 and in the period of January-April 2018 growth even accelerated to 5.5%. Economic growth is broad based – whereas agricul-ture is the only exception with a decline in 2017.
Banking sector: good performance, but challenges remain
Georgia’s banking sector has served well the needs of a growing economy. The ratio of banking sector assets to GDP has steadily grown and the ratio of credit to the real sector is high in comparison to other countries in the region. The sector stands out for the concentration of assets in the three largest banks which may give rise to concerns about competition in the sector and non-banking activities by the owners of these banks. The two largest banks are listed on the London Stock Exchange and therefore comply with high governance standards. Unlike in many other countries in the emerging Europe region, the Georgian banking sector has not experienced any major instability in recent years. Bank liquidity and capital coverage are very high and should provide ample buffers to withstand future shocks. The authorities have rightly developed a strategy of dedollarisation, based on a monetary regime that targets inflation. There is a need to expand the capital markets which could offer funding at longer maturities in the local currency.
Georgian economy outperformed expectations in 2017
The Georgian economy develops positively. GDP grew by 4.3% in 2017 and is expected to continue with similar speed in 2018. Economic growth occurred on a broad base: It has been supported by consumption, investment and exports.
Economic impact of new energy performance standards for buildings
The Energy Performance of Buildings Directive 2010/31/EU (EPBD) and the Energy Efficiency Directive 2012/27/EU (EED) will require a significant adjustment of Georgia’s energy efficiency policies with a profound effect on the building sector. Among the numerous measures which both directives contain, the requirement to set new legal minimum energy efficiency standards for newly constructed buildings and also buildings undergoing major refurbishment is the single measure with the largest economic impact.
The creative sector in Georgia: Situation, potential and policy issues
Georgia has a rich cultural tradition as well as an affinity for unique designs. Can this creativity be an economic asset? This can in principle be assessed by using the standard “creative industries” approach, which measures several industries in the creative sector. Due to data limitations, we develop and use a slightly simplified method based on the international approach for Georgia.
Unlocking the export potential of Georgian agriculture
Aim of this Policy Briefing: Recommendations for boosting agri-food exports
Structure of the Policy Briefing:
- Analysis of current agri-food exports
- Identification of potential
- Constraints on current exports
- Options for producers
- Policy recommendations
Unlocking the export potential of Georgian agriculture
Georgia’s agri-food export is concentrated in few products and few undemanding markets, making it highly vulnerable to shocks on a small number of commodity and geographical markets. At the same time, the diversity of climatic conditions and ample water resources create significant growth and diversification potential for Georgian agriculture. Georgian conditions appear especially suitable for the production and export of high-value niche products as the land mass is small and fragmented, both due to topographic conditions and present ownership patterns.